Perfil de traductor: Nguyen Hien (hiennguyen) | TM-Town

To Pay or not to pay dividend. Dividend policy determinants: an investigation of the influences of stakeholder theory. Financial Management, vol. Dividend policy and share price volatility: UK evidence. Journal of Risk Finance, no. Imad Zeyad Ramadan Dividend policy and price volatility empirical evidence from Jordan.

YC Liquidity and crises in Asian markets. Working paper. H The impacts of state ownership on information asymmetry: Evidence from an emerging market. China Journal of Accounting Research, vol. A Commonality in liquidity. K US corporate default swap valuation: the market liquidity hypothesis and autonomous credit risk. Quantitative Finance, vol. G Does monetary policy determine stock market liquidity? The switch to alternative energy has more benefits than drawbacks Paragraph 2: the negative aspects of alternative energy: [i] safety of nuclear power — example, accidents — Japan [ii] wind farms — noise pollution.

Paragraph 3: the positive aspects: [i] fossil fuels have created many environmental problems of pollution, alternative sources of energy do not do so [ii] wind, solar power are renewable sources, so energy supplies are sustainable Conclusion: despite some concerns, use of alternative energy sources should continue to be encouraged.

ANSWER As a result of the environmental problems which have resulted from traditional dependence on fossil fuels, some countries have invested in alternative energy sources. Although there are some dangers in this new approach, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. On the one hand, there are certainly some negative consequences of increasing reliance on alternative energy sources. Perhaps the main concern is the issue of safety.

Nuclear power is criticized for its potential to pollute the environment, and incidents such as the disaster at Fukushima Daiichi in Japan remind the public of the dangers of nuclear plants. The poisonous and radioactive emissions produced by the explosion not only killed many people, but also left a legacy of cancer deaths for the future. Another energy source, wind power, is criticized for a different reason. For example, many local communities oppose the installation of wind farms because they may affect the landscape and create too much noise from their generators.

On the other hand, the key factor is that alternative energy sources do not cause as much pollution as the burning of fossil fuels, such as oil or coal. Firstly, green Written by Ngoc Bach Website: www. As there are no carbon emissions, problems of climate change and poor air quality can be tackled by increasing use of alternative energy. Secondly, wind and solar power are both renewable sources of energy.

Instead of depending on fossil fuels, which are becoming exhausted, the use of renewable energy will guarantee a boundless supply of energy for the future generation. In conclusion, I consider that it is important for governments and the public to support the use of alternative energy sources, despite the safety concerns and other impacts. Essay Plan Introduction: sentence 1: some people think that more government money should be spent on preventing illness; sentence 2: disagree - more important to treat people who are ill.

Paragraph 2: it is important to spend money on prevention because [1] more and more people lead sedentary lifestyles, which can result in serious illnesses — it is Written by Ngoc Bach Website: www. Paragraph 3: however, it is more important to focus on treatment because [1] not all illnesses are the result of lifestyle choices, they may be the result of pollution or unhealthy living conditions, e. Conclusion: disagree — resources should be mostly allocated to treating people who are already ill. ANSWER It is true that some people argue for more public expenditure on measures to prevent illness by promoting a healthy lifestyle.

While this would certainly result in benefits to public health, I disagree with the idea that this should be a higher priority than the treatment of people who are already suffering from illness. The promotion of a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness is undoubtedly a worthy aim of any government.

Những điều cần biết sau khi phá thai

The sedentary routines of many people make them more prone to the risk of diabetes or heart disease as a result of their inactivity. In modern life, people are so caught up in the pressures of work or study that they neglect the importance of keeping fit. Dependence on the car exacerbates the problem of lack of exercise. Thus, government provision of affordable leisure and sports facilities, coupled with promotion campaigns to keep fit and healthy would certainly be a worthwhile initiative to raise the general level of public health.

However, in the process of decision-making on health matters, I would argue that expenditure should be allocated first to the treatment of people who are ill. Firstly, Written by Ngoc Bach Website: www. For example, respiratory disorders are affected by air pollution in cities, while poor sanitation and contaminated drinking water contribute to outbreaks of dysentery and cholera.

Secondly, failure to subsidise medicines or to invest in hospitals would certainly lead to many deaths which could have been avoided by timely treatment. Hospitals, for instance, have many roles in providing treatment, not only surgery but also in conducting vital research into the treatment of many lifethreatening conditions, such as cancer or asthma. In conclusion, while promoting healthy living is important, treatment must have priority in health service spending.

While this ideal is a worthy aim, I believe that it is impractical for governments to implement such a policy. On the one hand, it is not a utopian dream to expect government authorities to fund higher education for those poorer sections of society, with low incomes and no savings. Without such funding, people from poor backgrounds would be unable to attend university. As a consequence, they would be excluded from many wellpaid careers as engineers, doctors or lawyers. Social inequalities would be perpetuated and society as a whole would suffer, since those from low-income backgrounds would have no opportunity to develop their talents.

The example of the US, during the struggle for civil rights for blacks and other minorities, shows the folly of denying equal educational opportunities for the poor. On the other hand, there would be an enormous strain on government budgets if free access to university were a right for everyone.

At its simplest, people from rich families can afford to pay tuition fees and for their own maintenance during their studies.

• Cách chọn dương vật giả “chuẩn không cần chỉnh”.
• Staphylococcus aureus articles - Encyclopedia of Life?
• Hóa dược và kỹ thuật tổng hợp (Tập 1) - Phan Đình Châu.
• Xoa nền bê tông Đà Nẵng.
• bar gay a torrevieja!
• letra de enola gay en español!
• Năm 2021 chúng ta sẽ có thịt nhân tạo để ăn, nhưng liệu bạn có ăn không?.

Attendance at university is a privilege, not a right, and if students can afford to pay for their studies, they should do so. In practical terms, governments cannot pay for the rich as well as the poor. Governments are faced with practical decisions on how to allocate their finite budgets, and funding free higher education for everyone would mean less money to spend on pressing issues such as health care or the environment.

Example: Despite their different social backgrounds, they became good friends. Example: My part-time job paid for my maintenance while I was studying. Task 2: Schools should not force children to learn a foreign language.

Mua sách Gravity Falls Journal 3 – Khai mở điều huyền bí

While I believe that it is useful for schoolchildren to learn a foreign language, I agree completely that they should not be forced to do so. On the one hand, it will benefit the education of most children if they are encouraged learn a foreign language during their school years. Firstly, through studying the language they will learn about the culture of that country, and some schools even arrange exchange visits, to enable students to briefly immerse themselves in the culture of the foreign country whose language they are learning.

Secondly, children can access information in another language. For example, if they are studying English, they can enjoy websites which are only available in English on any topic in which they are interested. Finally, children can be encouraged to learn a foreign language through the range of enjoyable and fun materials available nowadays, especially interactive online learning.

On the other hand, it would be counterproductive to forcibly oblige schoolchildren to learn a foreign language. One reason is that children will not learn effectively through compulsion alone.

They must be motivated to do so and this is only achieved through enthusiastic teachers who select stimulating language-learning activities. Another reason is that schoolchildren will be reluctant to learn a foreign language if they cannot see why it might be relevant to their present or future lives.

For example, individual Vietnamese pupils should not be forced to learn English if they are certain that they will never need or want to use it in the future. In conclusion, I would argue that schools should encourage, but not compel, children to learn a foreign language. More and more people think there is no need for printed paper newspapers. While there are strong arguments to support this view, I would argue that there is still a continuing need for newspapers today.

The advantages of news which is available through the internet, TV or radio cannot be denied. Firstly, news from all around the world can be updated by the minute, often accompanied by live video or — in the case of radio — audio recordings. Thus, those who follow news such as political events, stock market movements or those who are simply keen on sport have all come to expect instant communication.

Secondly, only the most remote corners of the world now have no access to radio or TV transmissions, and the internet is casting its web to reach an ever-wider audience.

Quà tặng ý nghĩa nhân ngày 08/03

The spread of alternative options has therefore reduced the dependence on printed newspapers as the sole or main source of information. One reason is that not everyone wants or needs to live their life at a fast pace.

1. contactos gays girona!
2. Cargado por.
3. yu gi oh arc v español!

The elderly in particular often enjoy the leisurely routine of reading the newspaper over breakfast or while sitting in their living room in the mornings. Another consideration is that a printed newspaper can simply be picked up and put down at will. For example, I often read a newspaper on the train or bus to work and then I usually leave the paper on the seat for another passenger to read if they wish. In conclusion, although they have declined in popularity, printed newspapers are still a necessary part of communicating the news.

Discuss both views ANSWER: Upon graduating from high school, the young often wonder whether they ought to keep on studying further or not.

Bách khoa toàn thư mở Wikipedia

Many people believe that continuing to study at a university or college will be the best way to guarantee a successful career, whereas others believe that working right after school is a better option. Working straight after graduation is beneficial in some ways. Firstly, by working, young people will be able to earn money as soon as possible, and since they will likely be mature enough, they will be able to live independently on their own income.

It is also common knowledge that having a job leads to even more maturity. Secondly, a person who chooses to get a job instead of pursuing higher education is likely to progress rapidly in their career. This may help them to obtain a lot of real experience and skills in their chosen profession. On the other hand, there are a variety reasons why people tend to choose to continue their education after high school. First, a college education prepares young people to meet higher-level qualifications, which is what most employers expect these days.